4.10.2.1Life cycle assessment
Life cycle assessments (LCAs) are carried out to assess the environmental impact of products in each of these stages:
• extracting and processing raw materials • manufacturing and packaging • use and operation during its lifetime • disposal at the end of its useful life,
including transport and distribution at each stage.
That last clause is easy to miss and often carries a mark: transport counts at every stage, not just once.
Use of water, resources, energy sources and production of some wastes can be fairly easily quantified. Allocating numerical values to pollutant effects is less straightforward and requires value judgements, so LCA is not a purely objective process.
That is the key limitation. You can count the litres of water and the kilowatt-hours of energy, but deciding how many units of damage a given amount of pollution is worth — and how that compares with using more water — is a judgement, and different people judge differently.
Selective or abbreviated LCAs can be devised to evaluate a product, but these can be misused to reach pre-determined conclusions, for example in support of claims for advertising purposes. An LCA that counts only the stages where a product does well is evidence of nothing.
You should be able to carry out simple comparative LCAs for shopping bags made from plastic and paper, and to interpret LCAs of materials or products given appropriate information.
Worked example
Using the table above, argue which bag has the lower environmental impact.
- Compare the stages where each does better: plastic wins on manufacture and reuse; paper wins on raw materials and disposal.
- Weigh them. If the plastic bag is reused many times, its manufacturing advantage is multiplied and fewer bags are made in total.
- Identify the judgement being made: comparing persistent landfill waste against higher energy and water use is not a calculation, it is a value judgement.
- State a conclusion and the assumption it rests on.
Answer: A plastic bag reused many times has the lower impact, because its manufacturing advantage is spread over many uses; a plastic bag used once has the higher impact, because of its disposal. The answer depends on how the bag is used — and on how the pollutant effects are weighted, which is a value judgement.
Common mistake
Do not conclude that one product is simply "better". Say which stages favour each, name the assumption you are making, and point out that scoring pollutant effects requires a value judgement.
- Life cycle assessment
- LCA: an assessment of the environmental impact of a product across extracting and processing raw materials, manufacturing and packaging, use and operation, and disposal, including transport and distribution at each stage
4.10.2.2Ways of reducing the use of resources
The reduction in use, reuse and recycling of materials by end users reduces the use of limited resources, use of energy sources, waste and environmental impacts.
Metals, glass, building materials, clay ceramics and most plastics are produced from limited raw materials. Much of the energy for the processes comes from limited resources. Obtaining raw materials from the Earth by quarrying and mining causes environmental impacts.
Some products, such as glass bottles, can be reused. Glass bottles can be crushed and melted to make different glass products. Other products cannot be reused and so are recycled for a different use.
Metals can be recycled by melting and recasting or reforming into different products. The amount of separation required for recycling depends on the material and the properties required of the final product. For example, some scrap steel can be added to iron from a blast furnace to reduce the amount of iron that needs to be extracted from iron ore.
You should be able to evaluate ways of reducing the use of limited resources, given appropriate information.
The arguments for recycling metals are strong and worth having ready: it uses much less energy than extracting the metal from its ore, it conserves a limited supply of ore, it avoids the environmental impact of quarrying and mining, and it reduces the amount sent to landfill. Against it: the material has to be collected, transported and sorted, which costs money and energy, and for some products the separation needed is expensive.
Notice how the scrap steel example answers the separation question. Steel added to a blast furnace does not need to be sorted precisely, because the furnace is producing steel anyway — the required properties of the final product decide how much separation is worth doing.
Before you practise
- An LCA covers four stages: extracting and processing raw materials, manufacturing and packaging, use and operation, and disposal — including transport and distribution at each stage.
- Water, resources, energy and some wastes can be quantified fairly easily.
- Assigning values to pollutant effects requires value judgements, so an LCA is not purely objective.
- Selective or abbreviated LCAs can be misused to reach pre-determined conclusions, such as for advertising.
- Reducing, reusing and recycling all cut the use of limited resources, energy, waste and environmental impact.
- Glass bottles can be reused, or crushed and melted into different glass products.
- Metals are recycled by melting and recasting; the separation needed depends on the material and the properties required of the final product.